
First, there are tools that help the facilitator better detect plagiarism. "Free online search engines such as Google allow instructors to track down copied phrases, while commercially available plagiarism detection software and online services (e.g., Essay Verification Engine (EVE) and Turnitin.com) compare individual student papers to Web documents and/or essay databases to find and report instances of matching text" (Jocoy & DiBiase, 2006). I have not used the software programs, but the concept of them are very neat to me because students will turn in their work and then the software program would detect if there was any plagiarism. Nice and easy!
The second thing is to "educate learners about copyright, fair use, plagiarism, and cheating" (Palloff & Pratt, n.d.). Search engines are hugely popular when having to resea

Those two steps are also great ways to help prevent academic dishonesty. Another action an instructor can take is to rethink their ideas behind their assessments. When the word "test" is brought up to learners, a good 75% of them immediately get anxious and highly nervous and it seems like they have instantly forgotten everything they've learned. This then results to them not testing well and being more susceptible to cheating. However, if we (as the instructors) take a step back and do an open book exam or allow them to collaborate during assessments, this will decrease the feeling of needing to cheat and increase their success rate. The goal of these assessments is usually for the facilitator to gauge how well the learners are grasping the material. If the questions are strong enough with enough analytical thinking, broadening the scope of more than just being done individually can certainly increase their learning level, comfort level, and decrease cheating (Palloff & Pratt, n.d.). Many times we stress that allowing the learners to collaborate and teach each other the material, helps them retain it better. So, how is it different when taking assessments? We simply want to see how they are grasping the material and if we allow them to collaborate and observe how they do, we can tell from there how well they are able to explain and talk their way through the questions using their new knowledge and/or material. In essence, we are still reaching our objective with the assessment in seeing how well they are performing with their new knowledge.
So, with all of that great information, it got me thinking as to what tools I would use as a future online instructor. I would definitely use one of the detection software's mentioned to help me in detecting plagiarism.

One of the most important things to express to learners is that there is nothing wrong with using outside resources to help support an argument, but these absolutely must be cited. Otherwise, we are falsely expressing to our audience our knowledge and in the end harming our learning success. I like to end with the phrase "if you didn't say it, cite it".
References
Jocoy, C. & DiBiase, D. (2006). Plagiarism by adult learners online: A case study in detection and remediation. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 7(1), 1-15.
Palloff, R., and Pratt, K. Plagiarism and Cheating. Laureate Education, Inc. Retrieved April 7, 2011, from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=4894963&Survey=1&47=6260654&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=1&bhcp=1
Plagiarism. (2011, April). Wikipedia. Retrieved April 7, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism